Skip to main content

Election rerun? No thanks





The Jakarta Post | Mon, 08/03/2009 8:50 AM | Opinion

It is obvious now that Megawati Soekarnoputri and Jusuf Kalla, the defeated candidates in July’s presidential election, are trying to force Indonesia to hold an election rerun. They are determined not to accept the results announced by the General Elections Commission (KPU), claiming massive fraud was behind incumbent President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono winning 60 percent of the nationwide vote.

But Megawati, Kalla and their running mates, former generals Prabowo Subianto and Wiranto respectively, are horribly mistaken if they believe the public are behind them. The huge endorsement for Yudhoyono was a clear indication not only of his popularity but also of the public’s desire to see the election decided in one round. Indonesia essentially said a runoff was not wanted and they wished to get on with their lives.







Megawati and Kalla, clearly humiliated by the defeat, are still in denial. They have filed a petition with the Constitutional Court and submitted evidence of fraud in the hope the Court will annul the result and call for a new election.

Putting their evidence aside, the final KPU results were not all that different from predictions made by various surveys in the lead up to the July 8 election, as well as the results found by exit polls and quick polls on the election day itself. The public should have some degree of faith in the accuracy and credibility of these surveys as they were conducted independent of one another and still came out with the approximately the same results.

It would have been a different story if the survey outcomes varied significantly from the final election results. This happened in last month’s presidential election in Iran, and lead to the assumption that either the election was fraudulent or the survey’s were not credible. Fortunately, in Indonesia, we don’t have that dilemma, except in the minds of Megawati and Kalla and their supporters who believe the KPU and survey agencies are wrong.

But they are right in so far as the election was messy. Millions of people were not able to vote, and millions of others were registered more than once. But they will have difficulty in proving a systematic campaign to ensure SBY’s victory in the way that Soeharto, riding on a Golkar ticket, won the presidential election six times between 1971 and 1998.

It was not a perfect election by any means but it was as democratic and transparent as can be.

The mismanagement can be blamed on the incompetence of KPU members. We should have fired them after the scandalous and chaotic legislative elections in April. The KPU is fast losing the respect of the public. Their weakness has created loopholes that were exploited to the absolute zenith by certain parties. But as far as the election results are concerned, they remain valid if only because they were consistent with the various predictions.

Whatever their real intention in contesting the KPU results is, Megawati and Kalla have succeeded in taking the punch out of the election. Like the terrorists who conducted the fatal July 17 bombing at two hotels in Jakarta, their maneuvers have defused any celebratory mood that one would expect following the democratic elections. These procedures, where the losers gallantly concede and congratulate the winner as he/she embraces the losers, are part of the necessary forward steps taken following a divided election.

This is no surprise to Indonesia. Megawati never conceded in the 2004 defeat. For her, this will be a repeat performance.

But even if they managed to force a new vote, Kalla and Megawati are hurting themselves more than they are hurting the nation. Given the public sentiment against a new election, they are only making their case worse. Both the individual candidates and their parties, the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDI-P) and Golkar, will become the eventual losers as they will further jeopardize their chances in the 2014 vote.

This is one of those cases where we Indonesians are shooting ourselves in the foot. Outsiders have lavished us with praise for conducting free and democratic elections. But here, we are still engaged in petty fighting just to fulfill the egos of one or two individuals. Show a little bit of statesmanship for once please.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Iranian Clerics Protest Election Results

By VOA News 05 July 2009 A group of leading Iranian clerics has criticized the results of the country's disputed presidential election. In a statement released Sunday, clerics from the Association of Researchers and Teachers of Qom said Iran's official electoral watchdog, the Guardian Council, failed to adequately investigate claims of vote rigging by the opposition. The pro-reform group questioned whether the Council's validation is enough to legitimize the vote. Last week, the 12-member Council upheld the re-election of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. I ranian reformist presidential candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi during a press conference after polls closed in Tehran, 12 June 2009 Defeated presidential candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi has criticized the outcome. In a 24-page report posted to his Web site Saturday, Mr. Mousavi accuses supporters of Mr. Ahmadinejad of handing out cash to voters in the run-up to...

Military chief promotes 35 generals

Indonesian Military (TNI) chief Gen. Djoko Santoso has promoted 35 generals, consisting of 16 army generals, 11 navy admirals and 8 air force marshals. “It is expected that this time promotion will further enhance and improve the military performance so that we could give out the best output,” he said on Friday. Among those generals who receive the promotion is Rear Adm. Gunadi who is now posted as inspector general at the Defense Ministry, Maj. Gen. Langgeng Sulistyono, who is now posted as Diponegoro Military Commander and Rear Marshal Agus Dwi Putranto, who is installed as Abdulrahman Saleh Air Force Base Commander.

Chinese

Identifying someone in Indonesia as a member of the Chinese ( orang Tionghoa ) ethnic group is not an easy matter, because physical characteristics, language, name, geographical location, and life-style of Chinese Indonesians are not always distinct from those of the rest of the population. Census figures do not record Chinese as a special group, and there are no simple racial criteria for membership in this group. There are some people who are considered Chinese by themselves and others, despite generations of intermarriage with the local population, resulting in offspring who are less than one-quarter Chinese in ancestry. On the other hand, there are some people who by ancestry could be considered halfChinese or more, but who regard themselves as fully Indonesian. Furthermore, many people who identify themselves as Chinese Indonesians cannot read or write the Chinese language. Alth...